Fighting ignorance since 1973 Its taking longer than we thought
Followup: Can you get electrocuted peeing
on the third rail?
Your old column on whether somebody could be electrocuted peeing on the third rail was recently featured on straightdope.com. Your research standards were still a little shoddy back in the 70s, apparently. You based this answer on a single anecdote from a 10-year-old (at the time) book. I'm skeptical that the stream could remain uninterrupted and in contact with the rail long enough to be fatal, but there's so little in the way of facts or evidence in your article that it seems rather pointless to even argue it.
We need to get something out of the way right off the bat. I acknowledge this subject is low, gross, and disgusting. However, LG&D have never been major impediments to discussion at the Straight Dope, particularly if there's some offsetting social value, as in this case there unquestionably is. For one thing, this column's honor has been impugned, and at a time of national anxiety we can't have the reliability of a bedrock American institution (me) cast into doubt. We've also got the public safety issue to consider. Finally and I'm sure scientifically-minded readers will sympathize I just wanted to know.
I've made further inquiries. I'm not saying I've got the definitive answer. But I think I'm close.
Let's recap. We got the above-cited question in March, 1977 from "Impatient on the Howard line." We knew of no cases in Chicago but turned up one in New York, mentioned in Where Death Delights by Marshall Houts (1967). Houts told the story of Joseph Patrick O'Malley, a heavy drinker who was struck by a train while wandering through a New York subway tunnel. An autopsy turned up a contributing factor:
In my opinion this seemed pretty much dispositive. Houts had been an FBI agent, lawyer, judge, and professor of forensic pathology; surely he could be relied on. True, he reported just one case. However, the issue wasn't whether a lot of people had been killed in this way, but whether anybody had. My answer: yes. Next question?
As you can see, that wasn't good enough for the Teeming Millions. Wheelz, for example, has taken the view that facts, as they age, become less true. What's more, the factuality decay rate is remarkably steep a mere ten years out and you've slipped into the realm of myth. We also had those contrary results from Mythbusters, which seemed to show that death by peeing on the third rail was impossible except at implausibly close range.
Understand that I enjoy Mythbusters and have the highest respect for laboratory research. Lord knows if I had the budget for chain saws, high voltage, and incendiary devices, I'd be out in the back yard every day. However, you work with the tools you have. I resolved to see what more could be discovered with gumshoe work and Google, the reporter's best friend.
I soon had three candidate cases. Two were from Chicago; one had occurred only seven months after I wrote my original answer:
Only the 2008 account unmistakably indicated that the fatal current traveled up the urine stream (and who knows, that may have been the reporter's embellishment). The other two were vague on the details of death. For that matter, the original question merely asked if anyone had expired "while" (as distinct from "due to") peeing on the third rail. Obviously, however, the question of interest was whether a lethal jolt could be carried some distance by a narrow stream of fluid. Time to inquire further.
Obtaining an autopsy report from London didn't seem practical. The medical examiner's office in Cook County, Illinois, which handled the two Chicago cases, was less of a challenge. I filed a Freedom of Information request and a couple months later received a copy of the 14-year-old's post mortem. Points of interest:
The medical examiner's opinion was that the deceased had "died of electrocution while urinating on the power rail of the Rapid Transit System." That may be, but it seems clear the victim's arms and legs had come into direct contact with the third rail. There was nothing to suggest the current traveled up the urine stream. We'll cross this case off the list.
That left Sang Yeul Lee. The medical examiner's office couldn't locate the autopsy report. However, one of the paramedics on the scene turned out to be a high school classmate of Little Ed's.
I spoke to the paramedic. He remembered the incident well he'd been asked to testify in the lawsuit arising from the incident.
At the location where the accident occurred, Kedzie Avenue on the Brown Line on Chicago's northwest side, the tracks cross the street at grade. The victim had been drinking at a nearby tavern and apparently had walked a short distance onto the right-of-way from the sidewalk. Here's what the paramedic saw:
The medical examiner's office is still looking for the autopsy report. Pending its appearance, here's what we know: (1) the fellow had been electrocuted; (2) he'd been urinating on the 600-volt third rail; (3) he was close to but not in contact with the third rail when his body was found; (4) the position of his body was consistent with his having fallen backward; (5) he was wearing rubber boots, which presumably insulated him from direct contact; and (6) his blood alcohol concentration was an astonishing 0.341 (0.08 is legally drunk). We may conjecture, therefore, that he produced copious flow.
Maybe there's some other way for Sang Yeul Lee to have been killed besides the electrical current traveling up the urine stream. However, absent other information, it seems like the obvious explanation to me. You have to get pretty close before the third rail presents a danger, though. My advice: don't whizz off the platform (I say this mostly on sanitary and aesthetic grounds), and if that's too much to ask, at least stay off the damn tracks.
The Cook County medical examiner's office still hasn't turned up the autopsy report for Sang Yeul Lee. However, a spokesperson sent me a PowerPoint slide show that the office's medical staff had prepared for an internal presentation. Title: "To Pee or Not to Pee: An Overview of Electricity Related Deaths, and Examination of the Question of Whether Peeing on the Third Rail Can Kill." We note with satisfaction that the slide show quoted my column on the subject, including the mention of the two Chicago cases cited above. More important, it summarizes the autopsy findings for Sang Yeul Lee.
We learn that, contrary to what I was told by the paramedic, Sang Yeul Lee's body displayed a "large area of burn with marked charring" on the left knee, right wrist, right forearm, and right toes. Conclusion: Lee had been electrocuted by direct contact with the third rail, not by current carried up the urine stream. I'm disappointed, of course; I thought for sure this was a case of death-by-peeing. However, one accepts one's scientific duty. We'll cross Lee's name off the list, too.
We're not done yet. The Cook County spokesperson faxed me a page from the Color Atlas of Forensic Medicine and Pathology edited by Charles A. Catanese (2009). Dr. Catanese, according to Amazon, had spent ten years as a pathologist with the New York medical examiner's office. New York, you'll recall, was where Joseph Patrick O'Malley reportedly had been found electrocuted on the subway tracks with burns on the tips of his fingers and penis.
Page 367 of the atlas has a photo with the following caption:
Is the individual Joseph Patrick O'Malley? The atlas doesn't say, and faxing turned the photo into a black blot. However, I'm told the deceased was African-American, which presumably O'Malley wasn't.
I also found a 1988 article in Newsday about the Milton Helpern Forensic Museum in New York, named after the city's chief medical examiner from 1954 to 1973. The article says:
[I]n the [museum] repose the organs of that unfortunate man, the most popular of the 2,100 exhibits.
Does that mean we have three cases of electrocution-by-pee in New York, or one case that's been turned into three through multiple retellings? I don't know. However, I note that the subtitle of Where Death Delights, the 1967 book that was the source of the Joseph Patrick O'Malley story, is "The Story of Dr. Milton H. Helpern, Chief Medical Examiner to the City of New York." From this we deduce that all these stories originated with the late Dr. Helpern and the New York medical examiner's office. Clearly it's to this institution we must turn for further illumination. I'll get to it when I can. Don't look for it next week.
Follow STRAIGHT DOPE CHICAGO on twitter, assuming Little Ed remembers to send the feeds out, and if nothing else observe his fumblings with a technology that is obviously beyond him.
Send questions for Cecil Adams to email@example.com or post them on the Straight Dope Chicago Message Board.
Send comments about this website to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Advertise on the Straight Dope! Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.
Copyright 1996-2008 Sun-Times Media, LLC.